Studies in Language and Mind operates a double-blind peer review process. Reviewers are critical to ensuring the quality, integrity, and scholarly rigor of the journal.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Provide professional, unbiased, and constructive feedback. Reviews should focus on the scholarly content, clarity, originality, methodology, and relevance.

• Complete reviews within the standard 4-week period, or notify the Editor promptly if more time is required.

• All manuscripts and materials are confidential. Do not share, distribute, or use content from the manuscript for personal or professional purposes without written consent from the Editor.

• Alert the Editor to any suspected ethical issues, including plagiarism, redundant or simultaneous submissions, or undisclosed conflicts of interest.

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers should assess submissions on:

• Relevance to the journal’s scope and aims

• Originality and contribution to the field

• Adequacy and transparency of methods

• Accuracy and validity of data and analysis

• Clarity of presentation, structure, and writing

• Appropriate use and citation of sources

Conflicts of Interest

Decline to review if you have a personal, financial, or professional conflict of interest. Notify the Editor immediately if such a conflict arises.

Review Procedure

• Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.

• Reviewer identities remain anonymous to authors and each other.

• If recommendations differ, the Editor may seek additional reviews or make a decision in consultation with the Editorial Board.

• Recommendations may include: accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.

Recognition

Reviewing for Studies in Language and Mind is voluntary and unpaid. Your contribution is acknowledged in accordance with journal policy and may be included in reviewer recognition platforms if opted-in.